A quick theological question
Did Noah have to put two of every fish in the ark?
Update: I guess I should have titled this “A quick rhetorical theological question”, but in any case, thank you to everyone who sent me emails attempting to answer this question.
Philip wrote to say “only carried land animals” but doesn’t back that up with any references. Drew, on the other hand, had me RTFM by pointing to Genesis chapter 6, verse 20:
Of fowls according to their kind, and of beasts in their kind, and of every thing that creepeth on the earth according to its kind: two of every sort shall go in with thee, that they may live.
But that is immediately proceeded by verse 19 which clearly states:
And of every living creature of all flesh, thou shalt bring two of a sort into the ark, that they may live with thee: of the male sex, and the female.
Meanwhile, Pete points out there might have been seven of each type of kosher fish but just two of eels. Actually, it looks to me more like 14 of clean fish and 4 of unclean:
Of all clean beasts take seven and seven, the male and the female. But of the beasts that are unclean two and two, the male and the female.
Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
There are a lot of ambiguities in the specifications. I can’t help but feel that Noah would have been better off if God had been more like Jason Fried:
Noah, just build it. Get real!
P.S. Please forgive my blasphemy. I have the greatest respect for people’s beliefs and I don’t mean to mock sacred institutions like Judaism, Christianity or 37 Signals.
Saturday, April 29th, 2006 8:26pm
Tagged with question religion bible genesis noah
Illustrations
Thanks to the magic of machine tags, you can illustrate this post by tagging a picture on Flickr with:
Related
Technorati
Is anybody linking to this?
Flickr
Find photos I've tagged with question, religion, bible, genesis, noah, etc. on Flickr.
Find photos that I took on April 29th, 2006.
