August 3rd, 2016

Google’s AMP Project delivers on its promise of good performance: this message appeared blazingly quickly…

3:34pm

Responses

@adactio I’ve been seeing AMP pages on Google News for last 6 months with not even a single instance of “fail to load”.

@adactio “This website is best developed in…”

@adactio why did that appear? is it something in your content?

Interesting that Google should do this given it had a key role in convincing many that the XML model was unworkable twitter.com/adactio/status…

@adactio XHTML, remember?

@cmg @adactio to be fair, though: AMP has a lot of benefits and somehow you need to validate. Invalid RSS/Atom also doesn’t show.

@adactio it doesn’t make any sense, isn’t AMP supposed to be a feature subset of those bloated web pages…

@adactio to be fair though, we make it extrordinarily easy to check for validation errors: ampproject.org/docs/guides/va… :)

@pbakaus But what you do in the case of a validation error is over the top. Why not fallback to the non-AMP version?

# Shared by Patrick WC on Friday, August 5th, 2016 at 11:05am

# Liked by Stuart Robson on Thursday, August 4th, 2016 at 11:32pm

# Liked by Todd Parker on Thursday, August 4th, 2016 at 11:32pm

# Liked by Sue Apfelbaum on Thursday, August 4th, 2016 at 11:32pm

# Liked by Patrick WC on Friday, August 5th, 2016 at 11:21am

# Liked by Josh Williams on Saturday, August 6th, 2016 at 4:48am

# Liked by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 10th, 2016 at 9:23pm

# Liked by Esa Juhana on Tuesday, August 16th, 2016 at 10:54am