Cris (without an H)
@adactio </lo>?
Eight lines that can still be parsed by any of today’s web browsers:
https://gist.github.com/adactio/a515822dcb02ac9a66a7
1990-12-03
@adactio </lo>?
@adactio Even though the end OL is back-to-front?
@ambignostic An authoring error …which browsers handle just fine (and always have; one of HTML’s greatest strengths, in my opinion).
@ambignostic @mhmli Did your eyes get drawn straight to that as well? So weird!
@mhmli Yes, of course. Browsers ignore what they don’t understand. That’s the very strength of HTML.
@adactio Curious, was the </lo> a typo, or were end-tags supposed to be backwards?
@alastc It was a typo …which browsers ignored without throwing an error (and continue to do).
@adactio But I agree, it’s terrific that the browser can render it somehow, without choking.
@adactio is that </lo> on purpose?! Curious!
@stephenhay this new avatar is completely throwing me Stephen ;)
@adactio Now I want <lo></lo> to be an actual thing. Like <em>, but classier!
@adactio …and the oldest extant page on the Web, last modified 1992-12-03 (precisely two years later):info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/…
13 Shares
# Shared by sll on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 5:42pm
# Shared by Tim Baxter on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 5:50pm
# Shared by Chriztian Steinmeier on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 5:58pm
# Shared by Dez Iddon on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 5:58pm
# Shared by Higgs of Chaos on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 7:39pm
# Shared by Fernando Montoya on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 7:43pm
# Shared by Ivan Nikolić on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 7:53pm
# Shared by Dmitri Pisarev on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 7:57pm
# Shared by Jim Moran on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 7:59pm
# Shared by Jason Garber on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 8:12pm
# Shared by Zoffix Znet on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 9:39pm
# Shared by Andy Porter on Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 at 9:50pm
# Shared by fij on Thursday, December 10th, 2015 at 8:55am