Tags: 508

88

sparkline

Thursday, October 8th, 2020

Replying to

I don’t know anymore. What are words, even?

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2020

Replying to

Yay! Different skins for the same rendering engine! Yay!

Thursday, August 20th, 2020

Playing The Pigeon On The Gate (reel) on mandolin:

https://thesession.org/tunes/517

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsUwgQi6yE

Thursday, April 16th, 2020

Replying to

We fundamentally disagree. Based on the architecture of most framework-driven bloated single page apps today, the idea of separating concerns—much less progressive enhancement—isn’t even known about. This “gospel” had no disciples.

Replying to

The way I see it, the people encouraging progressive enhancement made almost zero impact. It wasn’t that the next generation misinterpreted the message; they never even got the message in the first place.

@FutureSyncConf Anonymous asks:

Great talk, Jeremy. Do you encounter push-back when using the term “Progressive Enhancement”?

https://app.sli.do/event/vxcnijew/live/questions

Monday, March 30th, 2020

Replying to

It wouldn’t. I don’t understand what you’re asking. The issue is with the sites (the vast majority) that aren’t being added to the home screen—they’re the ones being hobbled by this 7 day deletion.

Wednesday, October 2nd, 2019

Just had one last run-through with @Rem of our talk for @FronteersConf tomorrow: How We Built the World Wide Web in Five Days.

https://worldwideweb.cern.ch/

Sunday, September 22nd, 2019

Picture 1 Picture 2

Out’n’about in Edinburgh.

Saturday, August 24th, 2019

Replying to

Replying to

You won’t recommend me for a Product Manager job at Google?

My dreams lie in tatters before me.

How about a position on the AMP advisory committee? I’m hoping fascists like me aren’t barred.

Replying to

Never once did I claim that using AMP would result in fewer clicks for publishers.

It’s exactly because AMP is guaranteed to work this way—while nothing else will—that makes the situation unfair.

Publishers have no choice but to use AMP.

Replying to

But only for AMP pages.

No other framework gets this treatment.

No other web pages—no matter how fast—get this treatment.

Any wonder that developers are resentful of AMP?

Replying to

You are not alone:

https://baymard.com/blog/deemphasize-install-app-ads

During our testing “Install App” banners were the direct and sole cause of several abandonments of some of the world’s largest e-commerce websites.

Replying to

You’ll notice that I never once said that AMP is a ranking factor.

I said AMP is unfairly privileged in Google search results …because AMP is unfairly privileged in Google search results.

That’s a real shame for AMP-the-format.

Replying to

Tuesday, July 23rd, 2019

Having a beer on the beach.

Having a beer on the beach.

Monday, June 3rd, 2019

Taking in the sea air.

Taking in the sea air.

Thursday, May 16th, 2019

Replying to

Drinks sound great! …but I think I would gnaw my own arm off during Eurovision.

Sunday, March 24th, 2019

Picture 1 Picture 2

District of Columbia.